Version 1.0 · Effective: August 27, 2026 · Entity: AiTrade LLC, a Florida limited liability company
This is not the software licence. RailCall Station, RailHub Studio, and the RailCall CLI that you download and run are governed by their own licence, published at railcall.ai/legal/licensing. That licence is permissive and these terms do not narrow it. Nothing here restricts what you may do with RailCall source code you already hold — fork it, modify it, build commercial products on it, sell them. This document governs one thing: a service we operate, that you chose to use, to reach buyers we introduced you to.
This one document covers both sides of the RailCall Marketplace: publishing a Listing and buying one. It is an agreement between you and AiTrade LLC ("RailCall", "we"). It binds you when you create a Marketplace account, publish a Listing, or buy one — and it binds nobody else.
Three documents, three subjects:
Where they overlap, the more specific one governs its own subject. Where one of them appears to restrict what the software licence already grants you, the software licence wins.
You need a Marketplace account to buy or sell, and you must be able to enter a contract in your jurisdiction. You are responsible for what happens under your credentials. Keep your password out of scripts, screenshots, and repositories.
Publishing additionally requires a seller profile, a registered Ed25519 publisher public key, and — for any paid Listing — completion of the payment processor's onboarding and identity verification. Free Listings require the account and the key only.
Counsel — the badge says more than this paragraph doesA Publisher who has completed no identity verification currently carries a badge reading “Verified Publisher.” The badge is automatic on key registration, and by the paragraph above a free Listing needs only an account and a key. The Trademark Policy §5.2 is careful about this — it says the badge is “a statement about key registration, not about quality, security, or conduct” — but the word on the badge is “Verified,” and a buyer reads the word, not the policy. That is the exact harm Trademark Policy §4.9 prohibits third parties from causing, and we would be committing it first. §6.3 is corrected above to distinguish paid from free, which narrows the gap but does not close it. Two clean fixes: rename the badge to “Signed Publisher” or “Key-Registered Publisher,” which is what it actually means; or gate it on identity verification for everyone. Decide before the badge is on more pages.No account is required to download, install, or run RailCall. The account exists for the Marketplace.
Publishing is open on published criteria. It is not curated by relationship, invitation, introduction, partnership status, employment history, geography, company size, or whether we have heard of you. A Publisher qualifies if, and only if, they:
Nothing else is a condition of publishing. Applying is free and joining is free. These terms are offered on the same basis to everyone, including to people and companies that compete with RailCall. We do not reserve a right to refuse a Listing because it competes with a RailCall product, because it competes with another Publisher, or because we would prefer to build it ourselves.
RailCall's own Listings go through the same submission queue and the same Acceptance Criteria, and are labelled as first-party in the catalogue. Search ranking, category placement, and default sort apply the same rules to first-party and third-party Listings. We do not rank a Listing higher because it is ours.
A reviewer must not decide on a Listing that competes with one they publish themselves or hold an economic interest in. Where no unconflicted reviewer is available, the conflict is disclosed in the decision and the Publisher may require escalation under §5.4.
These are the only grounds on which a Listing may be refused. A refusal must cite at least one by number.
Not grounds for refusal: commercial competition with RailCall or with any other Publisher; price; the Publisher's identity, size, nationality, or reputation; our own product plans; stylistic preference; or that a similar Listing already exists.
Quality is judged against A1–A9, not against taste. A Listing that is unremarkable but honest, safe, and accurately described passes.
A decision that says only "does not meet our standards" is not a decision under these terms.
Business days, from a complete submission.
| Submission | First decision within |
|---|---|
| First Listing from a new Publisher | 10 business days |
| New Listing, Publisher in Good Standing | 5 business days |
| Resubmission after needs work | 3 business days |
| Patch adding no new destination, credential, or write command | 2 business days |
| Security patch to a live Listing | Same business day, expedited |
A missed service level does not auto-approve the Listing. Auto-approval on a timer, in a marketplace for code that runs on other people's machines, converts our backlog into the buyer's security incident.
Instead: the submission moves to the front of the queue, the Publisher may escalate immediately under §5.4 without waiting, and the seller fee is waived on that Listing for its first ninety days of sales. We pay for our delay out of our own margin, not out of the buyer's safety.
Any reject, any removal under §14, and any suspension may be appealed.
The reason given in a decision is the reason. We will not reject on one ground, have it overturned, and then reject the same submission on a ground we could have raised the first time — except where the new ground is a security or legal defect discovered later, or arises from a change the Publisher made.
No fee exists that is not on this page.
| Fee | Rate | Who pays | When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seller fee | 0% | Nobody — nothing is deducted from the Publisher’s proceeds | Every sale and renewal |
| Buyer assurance fee | 15% | Buyer, added at checkout as its own line | Every purchase and renewal |
The Publisher keeps 100% of the list price. The Publisher pays us nothing: no seller fee, no tiers, no volume bands, no listing fees, no placement fees, no featuring fees, no mandatory advertising spend. The single fee on a sale is the Buyer’s assurance fee, and it is disclosed to the Buyer at checkout as its own line rather than deducted from the Publisher’s proceeds.
A Listing at $100: the Buyer is charged $115 — $100 plus a $15 assurance fee, shown separately before payment. The Publisher receives $100, the full list price. Payment-processing costs come out of the assurance fee, not the Publisher's.
CounselConfirm that the payment integration actually pays 100% of the list price and absorbs processor fees out of the assurance fee. This is a harder engineering claim than the 95% split it replaces: at a 0% seller fee there is no margin on the Publisher's side to net processing against, so a payout that quietly deducts the processor's cut would pay about $97 on a $100 Listing and contradict this section. The terms, the payout code, and the pricing page must say the identical thing on the same day.Counsel — §6.7 notice on this very changeThis schedule changed on 2026-08-27from 5% seller / 10% buyer (publisher keeps 95%) to 0% / 15%. §6.7 requires not less than 30 days’ written notice of a rate change, applied prospectively only. The seller-side move from 5% to 0% is favourable and can take effect immediately. The buyer-side move from 10% to 15% is adverse to Buyers, and to Publishers whose Listings become 5% more expensive at checkout without their price changing. Decide the effective date and the notice method for the buyer-side increase before it is charged, and state on this page which schedule governed which period.The list price and the assurance fee are shown as separate lines at checkout, and the total is shown before the Buyer pays. We do not add a fee after the Buyer has committed, and we do not describe the assurance fee as anything other than what it is.
This replaces the sentence in v0.1 that said "the listed price is the price you pay — RailCall does not add hidden fees at checkout." A 15% buyer-side fee exists. Disclosing it is the fix.
Stated plainly, because a fee called assurance that assures nothing is the fastest way to lose a serious buyer. On every release of every third-party Listing, it buys:
It recurs on renewals because the verification recurs on every release.
It does not buy, and no Listing may imply otherwise:
In this order: taxes we or the processor must collect and remit; refunds; chargebacks. A refund or chargeback reverses the whole sale: the Publisher's share is the full list price, so the full list price is what comes back off it, and the Buyer's assurance fee is refunded with the purchase rather than kept by us. We do not retain a fee on a sale that was refunded.
The two fees in §6.1, the deductions in §6.4, and taxes are the complete set of amounts we take from a Publisher's sale. We do not charge to list, to update, to appear in search, to be featured, to be reviewed, to appeal, to withdraw, or to export.
Counsel / Founder — the live pricing page sells one of theseThe live pricing page, fetched 2026-08-27, advertises “optional featured placement available” immediately after “No listing fees.” That cannot coexist with this closed list, with §6.1’s “no placement fees, no featuring fees, no mandatory advertising spend,” or with §3.2’s promise that search ranking and category placement apply the same rules to first-party and third-party Listings. Three of the strongest trust claims in this document turn on the closed list being genuinely closed, so this is not a wording problem — it is a decision about whether the Marketplace sells placement. If it does, these clauses must change and the paid placement must be disclosed as an advertising product distinct from ranking. If it does not, the pricing page must drop the line. Do not publish both.Sale proceeds are credited to the Publisher's Marketplace balance in the same transaction that marks the sale paid, so the balance always reflects the ledger. Payouts are requested from the publisher dashboard and require a payout method on file, a minimum balance of $50 USD per request, and a review before transfer. Approved payouts transfer within 5 business days. Rejected or failed payouts return the reserved amount to the available balance automatically.
We may withhold or delay a payout where we reasonably suspect fraud or a chargeback pattern, where a breach of §10 or §11 is under investigation, or where required by the processor or by law — for as long as reasonably necessary to investigate, with written reasons and a monthly status update while the hold lasts.
Payout disputes must be raised within 90 days of the statement in question.
CounselDoes holding sale proceeds as a Publisher balance before payout require money-transmitter analysis in Florida or elsewhere, or should funds flow through Stripe Connect so we never hold them? This mechanism is already described on the live v0.1 page; the question has not been answered.Not less than 30 days' written notice. Revised rates apply prospectively only — to sales and billing periods after the effective date, never retroactively. A Publisher who does not accept a new rate may withdraw under §7.3 with full continuity for existing Buyers and no penalty.
A Publisher may list at $0. Free Listings carry no seller fee and no assurance fee, go through the same review, and get the same catalogue treatment. Paid Listings are priced in USD, with a $0.50 minimum imposed by the payment processor.
Publishing transfers no intellectual property to RailCall. The Publisher grants RailCall a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free licence to host, index, verify, market, distribute, and deliver the Listing through the Marketplace, and to display Listing metadata publicly — and nothing more. That licence:
The Publisher sets the list price, the pricing model (one-time or subscription), and the billing interval, and may change them at any time, prospectively. We do not set, cap, floor (beyond the processor's $0.50 minimum), or require a price as a condition of listing, and we do not run a discount or promotion on a Publisher's Listing without their written agreement.
At any time, for any reason, without penalty. On withdrawal:
We will not use a Publisher's Listing, its code, its Manifest, its catalogue copy, or non-public data about its performance to build a competing first-party Listing.
Specifically, we will not use, for the purpose of building or specifying a competing Listing: the Publisher's source; their unpublished submissions or drafts; per-Listing sales, conversion, install, or search-demand data not published to all Publishers; or anything learned in review, support, or a dispute.
The honest limit. We build first-party Listings and will keep building them, and some will land in the same category as a Publisher's. This forbids cloning — building from the Publisher's own material or non-public data — not competing. A promise never to enter a category would be a promise we cannot keep.
So the covenant is procedural and checkable:
This is the clause that pays for the introduction. It binds both sides.
A Buyer is a Marketplace-sourced Buyer for a Listing if their first transaction with that Publisher for that Listing — or for anything materially equivalent to it — happened through the Marketplace. We introduced that Buyer. The seller fee is what the introduction costs.
For twelve months after a Marketplace-sourced Buyer's most recent Marketplace transaction with the Publisher, the Publisher will not solicit or accept payment outside the Marketplace from that Buyer for the same Listing, a renewal of it, or a materially equivalent substitute, where the purpose or effect is to avoid the seller fee.
It is not a non-compete, an exclusive dealing arrangement, or a claim on the Publisher's business. It reaches one specific Buyer we introduced, for one specific product, for twelve months. It expressly does not restrict:
If a Marketplace-sourced Buyer asks the Publisher, unprompted, to transact off the Marketplace, the Publisher may do so on telling us and paying the seller fee that would have applied.
We will not use a Publisher's Marketplace-sourced Buyer relationship to market a competing first-party Listing to that Buyer specifically, and we will not use per-Listing data that is not published to all Publishers to build or specify a competing Listing (§7.4). Category-wide and catalogue-wide marketing is unrestricted.
Both halves are load-bearing. Neither survives alone.
The remedy for a breach of §8.2 is the seller fee that would have applied to the avoided transactions, plus removal of the Listing and, for repeated breach, termination of the publisher account. We do not claim the Publisher's revenue and do not seek damages beyond that fee.
§8 survives withdrawal of a Listing and termination of the account, for the twelve-month period only.
Every Listing is signed with the Publisher's registered Ed25519 key over the canonical bundle. The signature and public key ship inside the Listing. The Marketplace verifies at publish; the Buyer's runtime verifies at install.
CounselState accurately what the signature covers. The live v0.1 page says the signature covers listing type, the sha256 of the canonical payload, the price, and the timestamp. The shipping module tooling puts price deliberately outside the signed bundle so a price change needs no republish. Both cannot be true, and §7.2 (change your price at any time) depends on the answer. Resolve against the code before publication.A Buyer can take a receipt to a machine that has never run RailCall, fetch the install's published public key, recompute the integrity hash from the receipt's own contents, and verify the signature. Verification requires no account, no network call to us, and no fee, and is intended to stay that way.
This is the Publisher's strongest asset. It is what lets a Publisher tell a sceptical enterprise buyer: do not take my word or RailCall's — check it yourself.
The Publisher's key is their identity. Losing the seed loses the identity; back it up.
A valid signature proves origin and integrity — this Publisher produced these exact bytes. It does not prove the code is safe, correct, well written, free of vulnerabilities, or fit for any purpose. Provenance is a floor, not a warranty, and no Listing may describe a passing signature check as certification by RailCall (§16).
A Listing is not a sandboxed app on a phone. It executes on someone else's infrastructure, inside their trust boundary, holding their credentials, reaching their systems. A defective Listing does not crash a tab — it writes to a production database, sends a message that cannot be recalled, or moves data somewhere it should not be. Publishers accept obligations proportionate to that.
Scope note. Everything in §10 is about code you ask us to distribute to other people. None of it restricts what anyone may do with RailCall source code they hold under its own licence.
The Blast-Radius Declaration must be complete and accurate on every release: every destination, every credential, every irreversible action.
A materially inaccurate declaration is a terminable breach, not a metadata error. The declaration is the input to the Buyer's own policy engine. If it under-declares, the Buyer's controls silently fail open on the Buyer's own machine. This is the single most serious thing a Publisher can get wrong.
Request the narrowest credential scope that works. Pin egress to the hosts actually needed. Mark every command that writes as a write. Do not request scope for features not yet shipped.
A Listing must not attempt to: bypass, weaken, or disable the approval airlock; lower or evade a Buyer's approval-policy floors; suppress, forge, or omit receipts; read, exfiltrate, or transmit the credential vault; perform undisclosed network egress or telemetry; or execute code fetched at runtime from an undeclared source.
Separately, a Publisher will not circumvent the Marketplace's own entitlement, signing-verification, or metering mechanisms in order to place a transaction outside these terms.
A Listing cannot lower a Buyer's policy floors and must not try. An attempt is a security incident under §14, regardless of intent or whether it succeeded.
Publishers are responsible for everything they ship, including dependencies. Pin versions. Do not fetch code at install or run time from an undeclared source. Every dependency's licence must permit distribution on these terms. A Publisher should be able to state the provenance of every third-party component on request.
No credentials, API keys, tokens, private keys, personal data, or customer data in a published Listing — ever, in any release, including examples, fixtures, and test data. Secrets belong in the Buyer's own vault. A Listing found to contain a live secret is removed immediately under §14 and the Publisher must treat that secret as compromised.
Every release goes through review. Publishers must not use the update channel to widen scope quietly: a release that adds a destination, a credential, or a write command is a scope change and is reviewed as one, whatever the version number says.
Publishers must accept vulnerability reports and give a substantive first response within 5 business days. On a confirmed vulnerability, the Publisher works with us on a coordinated fix and Buyer notification. We will not publish details of an unfixed vulnerability before the agreed disclosure date except where Buyers are at active risk. Good-faith security researchers who follow the published disclosure process are not pursued by us for reporting a defect in a Listing or in the Marketplace.
A Listing may not:
We may decline or remove a Listing under this section. Removal under §11 is appealable under §5.4.
Prices are shown in USD. At checkout the list price and the 15% assurance fee are shown as separate lines, and the total is shown before payment (§6.2).
After payment, the Buyer receives an install command per Listing purchased. Installing writes a signed package into the Buyer's own RailCall workspace. It does not mean any action fires — the local airlock still requires approval for anything with external side effects, on the Buyer's own machine, under the Buyer's own policy.
A Listing is not a service RailCall performs on the Buyer's behalf. Execution happens on the Buyer's machine, under the Buyer's RailCall install, with the Buyer's credentials. The Marketplace is content distribution, not managed hosting.
30 days from purchase, no questions asked. A full refund on request within 30 days of paying, for any reason: didn't solve the problem, described incorrectly, technical failure, changed your mind. Refunds are processed to the original payment method within 5 business days of approval, and the assurance fee is refunded with the purchase.
On refund, your entitlement to the Listing is revoked, and you agree to stop using it and remove it from your systems. We will be straight about this one: licence enforcement is local by design (§15), so nothing on our side can tell whether you did, and we are not going to build something that can — the architecture that makes a purchased Listing keep working without us is the same architecture that makes this unpoliceable. It is stated because the Publisher absorbs the reversal under §13.3, and they should have a claim if someone takes the refund and keeps the goods. Most people will do the right thing, and the ones who do not are not the ones a clause was ever going to stop.
After 30 days, refunds are handled case by case at legal@railcall.ai. There is no hard cutoff for a valid claim — a Listing that turns out to be malicious is refunded past the window. Cases under §11 do not need to be timely.
Refunds and chargebacks are reversed against the Publisher's share in the same proportion as the original split. Because the Publisher keeps 100% of the list price, the reversal against the Publisher is the full list price — and the Buyer's assurance fee reverses to the Buyer, so we keep nothing either. Where the available balance cannot cover a reversal, the shortfall is recorded as a debit and nets against future Marketplace sales.
For an individual Publisher, that is the whole remedy. Where the Publisher is an individual rather than an entity, we net the shortfall against future Marketplace earnings and do not pursue it as a personal debt — except where the refund arises from fraud or from a materially false Blast-Radius Declaration.
Where a Listing shows a refund rate materially above the catalogue norm, we may require the Publisher to correct the description, may withhold payouts pending investigation (§6.6), and may remove the Listing if the cause is a misdescription the Publisher will not fix.
We are a venue, not either party's agent, and have no obligation to mediate — though we may assist. The end-user licence is between Publisher and Buyer. We will provide either party with the transaction record they are entitled to.
Fee, payout, or settlement disputes: raise within 90 days of the statement. Undisputed statements are final after that. Review, removal, and suspension decisions: §5.4.
Where we reasonably believe a Listing presents an active security risk to Buyers, we may remove it immediately and without prior notice, and may suspend the Publisher's ability to publish new releases. Buyer safety comes before process.
Within 1 business day of an emergency removal: written notice; the specific defect and the evidence for it, to the extent disclosure does not itself endanger Buyers; what would resolve it; and the appeal path.
An emergency power without a same-week accounting is a discretionary power wearing an emergency's clothes.
Buyers who installed an affected version are notified of the defect, the affected versions, and what to do. The notice is factual, does not characterise the Publisher's motives, and is corrected publicly if the removal is later overturned.
Where a removal is not security-related, the Publisher gets 14 days' notice and written reasons before the Listing comes down.
The security removal power exists to protect Buyers and may not be used as a commercial instrument — not to resolve a fee dispute, not to pressure a Publisher on pricing, not to clear the field for a first-party Listing, and not as a substitute for the notice period in §14.4. A removal characterised as security-related and found on appeal to have had no security basis is treated as a non-security removal from its start date.
When the defect is fixed and verified, the Listing returns in the expedited lane, Good Standing is restored, and the public record notes the resolution.
By the Publisher: any time, for any reason, by withdrawing every Listing and closing the account. Accrued balances settle on the normal cycle. Withdrawal is not a breach.
By us — and removing a Listing and terminating a Publisher are different powers with different grounds.
Except in the emergency case (§14.1), termination requires 14 days' written notice, specific reasons, an opportunity to cure a curable breach, and the appeal in §5.4.
On any termination, however it arises: their intellectual property, all of it; their money, less amounts properly owed — termination is not a forfeiture event; their signing key and identity, which we never held; their Buyer relationships outside the Marketplace; and their export (§15.3).
And what continues without them: perpetual licences already sold survive, active subscriptions run to the end of the current paid period, and Buyers keep what they bought. A Publisher cannot revoke a Buyer's licence by leaving, and we cannot revoke it by removing the Publisher.
At any time, and automatically on termination, a Publisher may export a machine-readable file containing their Listings and metadata, release history and version records, aggregate sales and settlement history, and buyer counts by Listing and version — not Buyer identities or Buyer data, which belong to the Buyer. Available for 90 days after termination.
Publishing a Listing licenses none of RailCall's trademarks, and neither does the software licence.
A Publisher may state truthfully that a Listing runs on RailCall, is built for RailCall, is compatible with RailCall, or requires RailCall — in plain text, in the ordinary descriptive way.
A Publisher may not:
Full terms are in the RailCall Trademark Policy.
CounselConfirm the published URL for the Trademark Policy and that it goes live in the same change as these terms — this cross-reference must not point at a 404.We do not warrant that a specific Listing solves a specific problem. We warrant one thing: that the signature we serve alongside a Listing verifies against the Publisher’s registered key over the canonical bundle as defined in §9.1, and that we do not alter that bundle between the Publisher signing it and you installing it. Your own machine checks this at install without asking us (§9.2), which is the point — the warranty is worth something because you do not have to take our word for it. Individual Listings carry their own author, their own quality, and their own risk profile; the signed provenance record is what we deliver.
CounselThis warranty is the only affirmative one in the package, and it is keyed to §9.1’s definition of the canonical bundle — which §9.1 itself records as unresolved.The live v0.1 page says the signature covers listing type, the sha256 of the canonical payload, the price, and the timestamp; the shipping module tooling deliberately places price outside the signed bundle so a price change needs no republish. Until that is settled against the code, we do not know exactly what we are warranting. An earlier draft warranted “the byte-identical payload the Publisher signed” flatly, which asserts a boundary the drafters could not establish. Resolve §9.1 first; this clause then either tightens or stays as drafted, but it should not publish flatter than the fact.To the maximum extent permitted by law, our aggregate liability arising out of or related to the Marketplace is limited to the greater of (a) the amounts you paid to us, or that we retained from your sales, on the Marketplace in the twelve months preceding the claim, or (b) one hundred US dollars (US$100). Nothing here limits liability that cannot lawfully be limited, including liability for fraud, fraudulent misrepresentation, death or personal injury caused by negligence, or wilful misconduct.
Why the “or retained” and the floor. An earlier draft capped our liability at “the amounts you paid on the Marketplace.” A Publisher does not pay us — we deduct from what they earn — so for every Publisher on the platform that cap read as zero. A zero cap against a solo publisher is the fact pattern that gets a limitation clause struck in its entirety, and it would have taken the buyer-side cap down with it. A cap that survives is worth more than a cap that reads well.
Publishers indemnify RailCall against third-party claims arising from their Listings, including infringement, materially false Blast-Radius Declarations, and violations of law.
Where the Publisher is an individual rather than an entity, that indemnity is capped at the greater of the amounts paid to that Publisher through the Marketplace in the preceding twelve months, or $1,000 USD. The cap does not apply to claims arising from fraud, wilful infringement, or a Listing prohibited under §11.
An uncapped indemnity is a rational term between companies and an irrational one to demand of a solo developer clearing a few hundred dollars a quarter.
CounselConfirm the cap and the floor figure — this is a business decision as much as a legal one, and it is drafted to protect long-tail supply.Nothing in the Marketplace, and no Listing in it, is certified by RailCall against any regulatory framework. We hold no SOC 2 report today and make no HIPAA, PCI, or equivalent compliance representation for the Marketplace. Where we obtain an independent report, we will say so and name the auditor.
Material changes take effect on not less than 30 days' notice, published here and in the Marketplace, and sent to Publishers with live Listings. Rate changes follow §6.7. A Publisher who does not accept a change may withdraw under §7.3 with full continuity for existing Buyers and no penalty. Continued publishing after the effective date is acceptance.
Changes to the Acceptance Criteria (§4) are published as a diff, apply only to submissions made after the effective date, and do not retroactively make a compliant live Listing non-compliant — except where the change closes a security gap, in which case live Listings get a stated remediation window before enforcement.
Every version of these terms is kept at a stable URL so you can read what you agreed to.
Entity: AiTrade LLC, a Florida limited liability company. Governing law: Florida, without regard to conflict-of-law principles, matching the published RailCall Terms of Service.
Counsel(a) The entity block still needs AiTrade LLC’s registered business address. Counsel supplied the state of formation on 2026-08-27 and the entity block now reads “AiTrade LLC, a Florida limited liability company”; the address was not supplied and we have not invented one. Related: AiTrade LLC trades publicly as “RailCall” under Florida governing law, and Fla. Stat. §865.09 requires a registered fictitious name to do that — confirm the registration exists, it is about $50, and it is the first thing an opponent checks. (b) §19.1 now incorporates ToS §§18–23, which answers the arbitration question as drafted; confirm that incorporation is enforceable against non-US Publishers and against consumers, and how EU/UK consumer-protection rules interact with the refund and termination terms. (c) Confirm marketplace-facilitator tax obligations by jurisdiction. Separately and before the first payout: W-9 / W-8BEN collection and 1099-K / 1042-S reporting for Publishers. This is cheap through the payment processor’s connected-account flow and expensive to retrofit once money has moved. (d) Confirm whether a §512 designated agent has been registered with the U.S. Copyright Office, since §11 sets up a takedown process that confers no safe harbour without one — and note that §512(i) additionally requires a published, reasonably implemented repeat-infringer termination policy as a precondition. That policy is drafted at Acceptable Use Policy §5.2 and applies to Marketplace Publishers; confirm it, and confirm that a Publisher’s Listings are removed on termination.Publisher support, review questions, appeals, security reports, and refund requests: the publisher dashboard, the RailCall Discord, or legal@railcall.ai.
Counsel / OpsBefore publication, verify that every channel named here reaches a human, and name the person who owns review escalations. Support policy is Discord-first and the transactional email provider is wired but dormant. An appeal path that routes to an unread inbox is the clause a Publisher tests first, when something has already gone wrong.Sections 18 to 23 of the Terms of Service apply to these terms and are incorporated by reference — disclaimers, limitation of liability (as modified by §17.2 above, which controls for Marketplace claims), indemnification, changes, governing law, informal resolution, arbitration, the small-claims and injunctive-relief carve-outs, the class-action waiver, the 30-day arbitration opt-out, and the general provisions. Where those sections and these terms conflict on a Marketplace matter, these terms control.
In addition, and stated here so they are not left to inference:
The following survive withdrawal of a Listing and termination of an account, together with any provision that by its nature should: §6.4 to §6.6 (as to amounts already earned or owed), §8 (non-circumvention, for its stated twelve-month period only), §9 (what a signature attests), §11 (infringement claims), §12 (Publisher warranties as to Listings already sold), §13.2 and §13.3 (refunds already claimable), §15 (wind-down), §16 (trademarks), §17 (warranties, liability, indemnity), and this §19.
CounselThis section was added during review because these terms previously carried entity, law, and contacts only — no severability, no entire agreement, no waiver, no assignment, no notices, no force majeure, no third-party-beneficiary clause, and a survival provision covering §8 alone. Assignment matters most: publisher agreements should travel on an acquisition, and without a clause they may not. Confirm the incorporation-by-reference approach is preferred to restating §§18–23 in full here — it is shorter and cannot drift, but it does mean a Publisher has to read two documents to find the arbitration clause, and consumer-facing enforceability of an incorporated arbitration provision should be checked separately for non-US Publishers.Entity: AiTrade LLC, a Florida limited liability company · Governing law: Florida · Last updated: August 27, 2026
See also: Licensing · Trademark Policy · Terms of Service · Privacy Policy